点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
沙县小吃第一村的文旅追梦路******
天仪再始，岁律更新。走进全国乡村旅游重点村福建省三明市沙县区俞邦村，村口的“沙县小吃第一村”几个大字熠熠生辉，村庄干净整洁，“寻根追味”小吃街美食飘香，络绎不绝的游客在这里品小吃、赏美景，感受这冬日里的暖意。
俞邦村位于沙县区夏茂镇北部，建村已有1200多年，是著名的革命老区村。全村有600多人外出经营沙县小吃，占全村劳动人口的88%，有“沙县小吃第一村”的美誉。
俞邦村依托传统美食沙县小吃，不断深化文旅融合，做优“寻根追味”特色乡村游，打造富民产业，助力乡村振兴，走出一条革命老区高质量发展的新路子。
漫步在俞邦村，这里绿荫如盖、溪水绕村。村里一幢幢漂亮别致的农家小院错落有序，一条条平坦洁净的水泥路穿过村庄、一座座青砖黛瓦的民宿有序排列，一幅美丽乡村的图景徐徐铺开。
“这两年来，游客越来越多，村里不断改善村容村貌，通过实施俞邦客厅亮化工程，对主街住宅进行改造，院前花开四季，不断提升整个村庄的颜值。”俞邦村党支部书记张昌松说。
与此同时，俞邦村还大力实施项目带动战略，紧紧围绕小吃、文旅等特色产业，做足“小吃+文旅”这篇大文章。
在村里的木窠卡丁车露营项目现场，工人们正在热火朝天地施工。“这个项目占地20多亩，总投资100万元，预计于春节期间对外开放，将填补俞邦村露营旅游业态的空白。”张昌松介绍说。
此外，俞邦村先后投资约4000万元，打造了沙县小吃民俗风情馆、儿童乐园等40多个项目，不断丰富旅游业态；推出“沙县小吃原材料种植—小吃制作—小吃品尝”互动体验项目，进一步增加游客体验元素，吸引更多游客，擦亮“沙县小吃”品牌。
走进沙县小吃民俗风情馆，可以看到“溯源传承话美食”“沙村人家食为天”“小吃文化系风情”等篇章，充分展示了沙县小吃的前世今生。“看着这些精美的画面，仿佛穿越时空，感受到那浓浓的烟火气。”来自厦门的游客张希笑着说。
在俞邦村提升改造建设过程中，沙县区小吃文化旅游发展集团作为推动小吃产业发展、壮大文旅产业规模的运作实体，发挥着重要的作用。“近两年来，集团分步实施建设了俞味·小吃文旅餐厅、俞生有梦·精品民宿等项目，不断丰富旅游产业链，不断打响‘沙县小吃’文化和旅游品牌。”沙县区小吃文化旅游发展集团董事长、总经理童友健说。
手锤扁肉馅、油炸春卷……采访当天中午时分，村里的“寻根追味”小吃街生意火爆。这里的小吃店高高挂起彩旗、招牌，家家户户备着各类特色美食。70多岁的村民俞和传正在自己的小吃店忙碌着，只见他一边招呼客人，一边将包好的扁肉下锅，将拌面用笊篱捞出，撒上葱花，淋上酱汁，动作一气呵成。
“我们村的生意越来越好。我家的小吃店一天营业额高时可达4000多元。去年忙不过来时，就让女儿和女婿过来帮忙。今年直接让小儿子留在家帮忙。”俞和传笑着说，“现在我们家一年纯收入就有十来万元，在家门口赚上了‘旅游钱’，我们很感恩、很满足。”
据统计，2022年，俞邦村接待游客超20万人次，人均收入2.8万元，村集体收入38万元。
“我们以‘明星村’俞邦村为联建主村，联合长阜、松林、儒元、东街、西街等5个村党支部，成立俞邦片区党委，整合资源，串点成线，握指成拳。片区六村股份经济合作社共同注册成立‘福建省夏茂俞邦片区农贸发展有限公司’，打造乡村振兴样板。”夏茂镇党委书记张卫华说。
“2022年以来，公司围绕发展小吃、文旅、茶叶、林业等‘四大主导产业’，创立了‘寻味俞邦’‘俞生有礼’等伴手礼品牌。据统计，2022年，公司实现销售额近百万元。”夏茂俞邦片区农贸发展有限公司办公室主任饶启圣介绍。
砥砺奋进新征程。站在新的起点上，张昌松信心满怀。（李金枝）
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
彩云网地图 |
)